
01
Trump Proposes $70K Fee for Foreign Student Work Program
The gist: The Trump administration proposed making institutions pay a $70,000 fee for most international students starting OPT, with a $30,000 fee for STEM extensions.
Big pictureSupporters say the fee could discourage fake jobs and other OPT fraud, while critics say it could make U.S. colleges and jobs less attractive to international students. That could affect university enrollment, employers in fields needing workers, and the country’s ability to attract talent.
Explain like I'm 5OPT lets some international students work in the U.S. after finishing school. The government wants colleges to pay a very large fee before recommending a student, like charging a toll before a graduate can take a job.
Why it matters nowThe proposal was released Wednesday and is open for public comment for 30 days before the Department of Homeland Security reviews feedback and decides whether to finalize it.
Three things to know01STEM extensions cost less
The proposed fee would be $30,000 for a STEM OPT extension rather than the $70,000 charge for starting OPT.
02Earlier approvals are protected
Students whose OPT is approved before the fee takes effect would not have to pay it.
03Schools could shift costs
Although institutions would initially be expected to pay, the proposal says they could pass the cost to students, employers, or the broader student body.
Trusted source
Inside Higher Ed ↗

02
Efficient or a gutting? Head Start proposed rule polarizes commenters
The gist: The proposed Head Start overhaul would cut many federal safeguards in the name of flexibility and savings, sparking a sharp debate over its effects on 771,000 low-income children.
Big pictureThe debate is about how to balance local choice and lower bureaucracy with consistent quality for children and families who rely on the program. Because Head Start is federally funded but locally delivered, changing national standards could affect communities differently.
Explain like I'm 5Head Start is like a helper program that gives young children meals, learning, health care and other support. The government wants to give local programs more freedom, but critics worry that fewer rules could mean less protection and support.
Why it matters nowThe public comment period has ended after nearly 40,100 comments, and HHS will review them before deciding whether to issue a final rule.
Three things to know01Classroom rules could loosen
The draft would remove federal requirements covering class sizes and ratios, curriculum expectations and some staffing rules.
02Administrative funding would shrink
The proposed administrative-cost cap would fall from 15% to 5%, which critics say could force programs to choose between staffing and improvements such as longer hours or technology.
03The draft adds new requirements
Programs would have to provide whole foods, offer 30 minutes of physical activity for every 3.5 hours of classroom instruction and meet state licensing requirements.
Trusted source
K-12 Dive ↗

03
DOJ suffers court loss over in-state tuition for undocumented students
The gist: A federal judge rejected the DOJ’s challenge to Virginia’s in-state tuition laws, marking the agency’s second court loss in its nationwide campaign and affecting more than 1,200 students.
Big pictureThe case is part of a larger fight over whether states can offer in-state tuition to certain undocumented students. Courts have reached different conclusions, creating a patchwork of policies while the DOJ’s lawsuits and appeals continue.
Explain like I'm 5Virginia lets some undocumented students pay the same college tuition as other students in the state. The DOJ said a federal rule forbids that, but the judge said Virginia’s rules do not break the rule.
Why it matters nowJudge Robert Payne dismissed the DOJ’s Virginia lawsuit this week, adding to an earlier dismissal in Minnesota as cases against 24 states and Washington, D.C., move forward.
Three things to know01Virginia uses more than residency
One Virginia law requires qualifying students to have attended school or received home instruction in the state and to show that they or a parent filed Virginia tax returns for at least two years.
02Wording drives the dispute
The DOJ read the federal law to mean all U.S. citizens must qualify, while Payne read it to mean one or more citizens, avoiding a result that could eliminate in-state tuition altogether.
03States face mixed rulings
Judges sided with the DOJ in Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Texas, while Payne said several of those cases involved laws explicitly tied to residency.
Trusted source
Higher Ed Dive ↗